|
The Attributes of Leadership: A Checklist
Max DePree
From: Leadership Jazz (Doubleday, 1992)
Click here for a printer-friendly version of this article
I arrived at the local tennis
club just after a group of high school students had vacated the
locker room. Like chickens, they had not bothered to pick up after
themselves. Without thinking too much about it, I gathered up all
their towels and put them in a hamper. A friend of mine quietly
watched me do this and then asked me a question that I’ve pondered
many times over the years. “Do you pick up towels because you’re
the president of a company, or are you the president because you
pick up towels?”
Leadership, as I said at the
beginning of this book, is a serious meddling in the lives of
others. Besides picking up towels, what other traits or attributes
qualify us to accept the job of leadership?
Some of my friends call me a man
of many lists. If you have read this far in the book, you’ll
probably agree. Here is a list that may help you coalesce your
thinking about the good work of leadership. In spite of my
admiration for lists, to catalog the attributes of a leader is like
fighting the Hydra. Like Hercules, I confront two more heads every
time I write one off. In examining one aspect of leadership, I soon
discover that I think of something else equally important. Just
another proof that leadership is something we never completely
understand.
Other people have made lists
about leadership. A good one is “The Tasks of Leadership,” a
chapter in John Gardner’s book On Leadership. I find that a
list brings a sort of discipline to my thinking, and I look at a
good list as a musical score. Before it really comes to life, it
must be interpreted and performed. How that is accomplished or how
you use a list is more up to you than to me.
Above all, leadership is a
position of servanthood. Leadership is also a posture of debt; it
is a forfeiture of rights. You see! One quality of leadership
always implies another. Where does one stop? Here is my list. See
what you think.
Integrity.
Integrity is the linchpin of leadership. Where integrity is at
stake, the leader works publicly. Behavior is the only score that’s
kept. Lose integrity, and a leader will suddenly find herself in a
directionless organization going nowhere.
Vulnerability.
Vulnerability is the opposite of self-expression. Vulnerable
leaders rust in the abilities of other people; vulnerable leaders
allow the people who follow them to do their best. An invulnerable
leader can be only as good as her own performance – what a
terrifying thought! One caveat: Remember that there is no such
thing as safe vulnerability.
Discernment.
You cannot buy discernment; you can find it. Discernment lies
somewhere between wisdom and judgment. Leaders are required to see
many things – pain, beauty, anxiety, loneliness, and heartbreak.
Two elements to keep your eye on: the detection of nuance and the
perception of changing realities. What kind of antennae do you
have?
Awareness of the human spirit.
In a special way, all the qualities of a good leader stem from this
one. Without understanding the cares, yearnings, and struggles of
the human spirit, how could anyone presume to lead a group of people
across the street? In modern organizational jargon, person skills
always precede professional skills.
Courage in relationships.
Followers expect a leader to face up to tough decisions. When
conflict must be resolved, when justice must be defined and carried
out, when promises need to be kept, when the organization needs to
hear who counts – these are the times when leaders act with ruthless
honesty and live up to their covenant with the people they lead.
Sense of humor.
Sometimes the best humor is deadly serious. I’ve often wondered
why. Part of the reason must be that a compassionate sense of humor
requires a broad perspective on the human condition, and accounting
for many points of view. Surely true leaders have it. You’ll find
a sense of humor essential to living with ambiguity.
Intellectual energy and
curiosity. When you are fortunate enough
to lead a group of people, opportunities arise constantly to learn
from those people. The very complexity of life today has turned
decision making into a process of learning and discovery requiring
great intellectual vigor of leader. We cannot make good decision
unless we accept the responsibility for learning frantically the
things that produce them. If you are intent on learning
frantically, you actively seek out what followers can teach. And
when you seek out the competence of your followers, you begin to
enable them to fulfill their potential. When followers are allowed
to do their best, they make leadership infinitely easier, and you’re
free to learn even more. A wonderful cycle, don’t you think?
Respect for the future,
regard for the present, understanding of the past.
Leaders move constantly back and forth between the present and the
future. Our perception of each becomes clear and valid if we
understand the past. The future requires our humility in the face
of all we cannot control. The present requires attention to all the
people to whom we are accountable. The past gives us the
opportunity to build on the work of our elders.
Predictability.
To their followers, leaders owe predictability as a human being.
This differs from predictability in strategic planning or
decision-making, something leaders also should pursue. Leaders must
be calculable forces in organizations; they are not free to follow a
whim. For example, since leaders are especially responsible for the
vision and values of an organization, I would grieve over an
unpredictable tender of a group’s birthright and future. Something
to keep in mind here: Tending a vision is as difficult as
conceiving one.
Breadth.
A vision of what an organization can become has room for all
contributions from all quarter. To borrow from Walt Whitman,
leaders are people large enough to contain multitudes.
Comfort with ambiguity.
“Leader” is not always a position. Whatever one’s position, the
amount of ambiguity involved is directly proportional to the amount
of leadership required. Healthy organizations exhibit a degree of
chaos. A leader will make some sense of it. The more comfortable
you can make yourself with ambiguity, the better a leader you will
be. Organizations always delegate the job of dealing constructively
with ambiguity to their leaders.
Presence.
I think that the ability to stop is an important trait of leaders.
Many large manufacturing plants have a fleet of bicycles that allow
people to save time on trips to various areas of the facility. Such
is the case at Herman Miller, but we have placed a restriction on
the use of our bicycles. No supervisor may ride one. The reason I
simple: You can’t have a conversation or ask a question from a
bicycle. You can’t tap a person going by on a bicycle on the
shoulder and say, “Could I talk to you a minute?” Leaders stop – to
ask and answer questions, to be patient, to listen to problems, to
seek the nuance, to follow up a lead. Leaders quietly and openly
wait for the information, good and bad, that enables them to lead.
I hope this list has both
pricked your thinking about leadership and opened you to the
potential of leaders. Perhaps one need remember no more than what a
friend of mine once said to me. “Leaders stand alone, take the
heat, bear the pain, tell the truth.” I am constantly excited by
what there is to learn!
From: Leadership Jazz by
Max DePree, copyright © 1992 by Max DePree. Used by permission of
Doubleday, a division of Random House, Inc.
Max De Pree is chairman emeritus of Herman Miller,
Inc., a member of Fortune magazine’s National Business Hall of Fame,
and a recipient of the Business Enterprise Trust’s Lifetime
Achievement Award. He has served on the boards of Fuller Theological
Seminary, Hope College, and Words of Hope. De Pree is also a member
of the advisory board of the Peter F. Drucker Foundation for
Nonprofit Management. His leadership insights are expressed in his
books, Leadership is an Art, Leadership Jazz,
Leading without Power and Called to Serve.
|