|
editorial
Teach the Whole
Truth
Michael
Zigarelli
click here for a
printer-friendly version of this article
Pastors and
Christian educators can suffer from two opposite but related errors
in their teaching. Pastors usually impart Biblical revelation while
ignoring scientific revelation; Christian teachers usually impart
scientific revelation while ignoring Biblical revelation. We would
all benefit if these leaders broadened their epistemology—their
understanding of what counts as "knowledge"—and taught more often
from the whole truth of theology plus science.
Error 1: The
Bible is All that Counts as Knowledge
First things
first. It’s an evangelical pillar that we gain knowledge from the
Bible. God reveals Himself and His will through the Judeo-Christian
scriptures. We learn from His Word what’s right and wrong, how we
should live our lives, how we should relate to one another, how to
have eternal life, and a plethora of other essential truths.
As significant
as all this is, we should also recognize that there’s more to
knowledge than what’s in scripture. There’s more to what’s knowable.
God also reveals things to us through our observation and scientific
study of His creation—revelation that we would not necessarily
receive from reading the Bible. The “special revelation” of
scripture has as its teammate the “general revelation” of science.
They work synergistically to yield the body of knowledge from which
we should teach.
We can go
further with this point, and we must in light of the controversy
swirling around the place of science in Christian thought. When we,
in the name of Biblical supremacy, discount the knowledge that comes
from scientific research, we risk discounting something from God.
One of the reasons God gave us brains is so we can use them to
discover more about Him and His world. We’ll not find a cure for
cancer in the Bible, but we will find it someday through our
God-given ability to study the disease. Similarly, we learn through research about the human personality, how to build a
sturdy bridge, how organizations function optimally, how to keep our
drinking water safe, and about countless other mysteries. Untold
knowledge flows from this general revelation of God; pastors and all
Christians must come to understand science this way, lest we accept
and teach a
truncated truth.
Here’s a brief
illustration of how this happens and what’s at stake. Consider a
question that’s familiar to the readers of this publication:
How can
we lead most effectively? Scripture has much to say on the topic in
both the Old and New Testaments. In fact, Jesus himself taught
directly on the topic (see, e.g., Matthew 20:25-28), and He modeled
the way of leadership for us to emulate. Pastors and Christian
authors conduct remarkably helpful exegeses on this subject,
offering us practical, Biblically-based leadership principles
accordingly.
But they could
offer much more completeness in their teaching, more depth and more
insight that will greatly aid those they are teaching. They could,
for example, dovetail in the decades of profound research that
identifies what actually works in the leadership of people,
families, organizations and entire nations. Is there not value to
these findings? Is there not truth uncovered in this work? Doesn’t
God’s “common grace” come into play here—His process of revealing
knowledge through those who may not even know Him—and if so,
shouldn’t we tap into that grace as we design and teach our
lessons?
The fact of
the matter is that there’s an
abundance of leadership knowledge available through this massive
line of scientific research—knowledge that supplements what we can
know about leadership from scripture, but knowledge that’s too often
sequestered by well-intended disciplers. To improve our
discipleship, we should teach leadership (and everything else) from
a Christian perspective by starting with the principles revealed in
scripture and then by bringing alongside the insights from scientific
research. This is the proper order, filtering the latter through the
former, thereby maintaining a Christian worldview on all subject
matter. Discipleship benefits immeasurably when our pastors teach from
this whole truth.
Error 2:
Science is All that Counts as Knowledge
It benefits
greatly when our Christian professors and school teachers do
likewise. Too often, these folks commit the reverse error in their
teaching. That is, teachers in Christian universities and secondary
schools typically focus on general revelation to the exclusion (or
at best, the marginalization) of special revelation. They too teach
a partial truth, and sometimes a particularly precarious one since
it may be built on the assumptions of a secular worldview.
Frankly, this
is the tainted fruit of their being trained in secular colleges and graduate
schools: They tend to adopt, often unwittingly, the presumption
that scientific knowledge is all that truly counts as knowledge.
This is why “faith integration” is becoming such an important
movement in Christian education. It’s an urgently-needed corrective
to the secularization of faith-based teaching—to limiting truth
claims to the realm of scientific study. (Several freely-available
articles in the Christianity 9 to 5 online library explore this
topic in depth, including
The Mission of the Christian University,
The Professor's Task in the Christian University,
The Challenge for Christian Higher Education, and
The Integration of Faith and Learning.)
The point of
all this, I hope, is straightforward: We Christians who have been
called to the teaching vocation can bless those who sit at our feet
by broadening our definition of “knowledge.” In theological terms,
we should enlarge our epistemology to include both special and
general revelation. Or in plain English, we should include the
knowledge that flows from both
theology and science as we educate those entrusted to us. Neglecting
either one compromises our commission to teach people
God’s whole truth.
Michael
Zigarelli
is an Associate Professor at Messiah College and the editor of
Christianity9to5.org.
NOTES
Of
course, science as practiced today often presupposes
naturalism, an atheistic view of how we got here and how the
universe operates—a presupposition that stands in contrast
to a Christian worldview. But that does not diminish the
findings of science, it only affects the interpretation
of scientific results. Properly understood, good science
reveals knowledge about how God has created us and the
world.
|